Peter Bergen, CNN\u2019s national security analyst, reflected on his experience interviewing Osama bin Laden in 1997 and the implications of his death on the future of al-Qaeda with an audience of more than 300 people at the Â鶹ӳ»´«Ã½ on Tuesday.<\/p>\n
The event, organized by the Â鶹ӳ»´«Ã½ Global Perspectives Office, was part of two 2011-2012 themes, \u201cPeople Power, Politics and Global Change\u201d and \u201cCovering Crises from the Frontlines.\u201d<\/p>\n
Bergen, who is also the director of the National Security Studies Program at the New America Foundation, began by sharing breaking news with the audience: the United States uncovered allegations that connect Iranian intelligence operatives with a foiled assassination plot targeting the Saudi ambassador to the United States.<\/p>\n
Bergen went on to highlight steps taken by the Bush and Obama administrations that make such interventions possible, such as the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, increased security measures at airports and better cooperation among federal agencies.<\/p>\n
According to Bergen, while these steps were necessary, it is important to put the threat of terrorism into perspective.\u00a0 He advocated for a renewed focus on policies that address the issue of terrorist threats while doing so in a more measured manner.<\/p>\n
He also addressed the criticism of the current administration, and he pointed to the overwhelming similarities between it and the Bush administration. He said parallels include the tripling of American troops in Afghanistan, the quadrupling of drone strikes in Pakistan and counterterrorism operations in Yemen and Somalia.<\/p>\n
Having written extensively about Osama bin Laden, Bergen also addressed the effect the terrorist leader\u2019s death will have on al-Qaeda.<\/p>\n
In addition to the obvious loss of an influential figure, he listed four fundamental problems that al-Qaeda faces: the unrestricted killing of Muslim citizens; a vague, undefined return to an Islamic caliphate; extreme actions that have led to a unification of opposition; and the tactical methods of terrorism that have overridden their strategic goals.<\/p>\n
Responding to a question regarding the possibility of a terrorist attack using nuclear weapons, Bergen explained that he was far more worried about a conventional conflict triggered by terrorism that could escalate into a nuclear exchange.\u00a0 Another terrorist attack like the 2008 Mumbai attacks carried out by Lashkar-e-Taiba, a terrorist organization based largely in Pakistan, could trigger a nuclear war between India and Pakistan, Bergen explained.<\/p>\n
In addition to the Global Perspectives Office, sponsors and partners of Bergen\u2019s presentation included the Â鶹ӳ»´«Ã½ Terrorism Studies Program, the Â鶹ӳ»´«Ã½ Global Peace and Security Studies Program, The Sibille H. Pritchard Global Peace Fellowship Program, Lawrence J. Chastang and the Chastang Foundation, Larson Allen LLP, the Â鶹ӳ»´«Ã½ Nicholson School of Communication, the Â鶹ӳ»´«Ã½ Diplomacy Program, the Â鶹ӳ»´«Ã½ Middle Eastern Studies Program, the Â鶹ӳ»´«Ã½ Political Science Department, the Â鶹ӳ»´«Ã½ International Services Center, the Â鶹ӳ»´«Ã½ Book Festival 2012 in association with the Morgridge International Reading Center, Â鶹ӳ»´«Ã½ LIFE and the Global Connections Foundation.<\/p>\n