doctorate in biomedical sciences<\/a>, with an emphasis on neuroscience.<\/p>\nEdwards says what he most appreciated about his experience at Âé¶¹Ó³»´«Ã½ was the freedom he was given to explore independently, embrace curiosity and think critically to innovate and discover answers. He points to that time as the building blocks that helped him guide Moderna through the unprecedented process of developing and licensing a vaccine within 11 months without a road map.<\/p>\n
\u201cI had to pull from experience in the past in developing new approaches to situations that were part of a vaccine development process. Without that kind of foundation \u2014 that ability to explore and develop myself in the way that I did at Âé¶¹Ó³»´«Ã½ \u2014 I would not have been prepared encountering those situations,\u201d Edwards says. \u201cIt really established who I am.\u201d<\/p>\n
His interest and expertise in vaccine development expanded when he accepted a position as a scientist for Sanofi Pasteur, one of the four major vaccine developers in the world. As he climbed the ranks in his nearly eight years with the company, he worked on a wide number of vaccine projects, including dengue, Zika, yellow fever, staph, flu and respiratory syncytial, which allowed him to learn every step of the process of creating a safe and effective vaccine.<\/p>\n
\u201cMy passion really grew and developed, not only in the work but in the mission,\u201d Edwards says. \u201cIt\u2019s a really nice idea to develop something that when you give it to somebody, it will protect them from something they\u2019ll never know they would have been exposed to; to prevent them from ever getting sick. I always wanted to help people. That\u2019s been my goal and objective, and getting to the position I had while at Sanofi and now at Moderna, it\u2019s beyond what my expectations were in terms of making an impact.\u201d<\/p>\n
While at Sanofi, he also gained a critical understanding of messenger RNA through partnerships with Translate Bio and Germany\u2019s CureVac, two mRNA vaccine developers. At the time, mRNA vaccine science was just breaking ground. Edwards worked closely with the companies in studying, developing and leveraging the same technology that years later would be a crucial tool to surmount an effective and swift response to the coronavirus pandemic.<\/p>\n
In short, he had molded himself to be exactly the type of scientist we needed when the world came to a crashing halt in the spring of 2020.<\/p>\n
\u201cI preach to my students all the time, if you\u2019re in this lab, you are going to have the skills to be able to change the world,\u201d says James Hickman, a professor of chemistry at Âé¶¹Ó³»´«Ã½\u2019s NanoScience Technology Center, where Edwards worked as he pursued his doctorate. \u201cAll I have to do now is point to Darin as proof.\u201d<\/p>\n
[photo id=”22217″ title=”LineDivider” alt=”” position=”left” width=”150px”][\/photo]<\/p>\n
Today, Moderna is a household name. But in June 2019 when Edwards accepted a position as an associate director of infectious disease, few outside of the field knew about the small startup that began in 2010.<\/p>\n
He says his first six months were relatively normal \u2014 weekends were still his own. And then rumblings of reports from China about a mysterious respiratory illness started surfacing.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe started talking to NIH immediately, and the theory was it was likely a coronavirus,\u201d Edwards says. \u201cWe already had the idea that there might be a need for a vaccine even before January 2020.\u201d<\/p>\n
Edward Holmes, a professor at the University of Sydney in Australia, posted the virus\u2019 genetic sequence online on Jan. 10, 2020, on behalf of a consortium led by Fudan University Professor Yong-Zhen Zhang in Shanghai. Halfway around the world, Edwards woke up the next morning to the revelation, a meeting was convened with his collaborators at NIH, and the sprint to create the vaccine began.<\/p>\n
Traditionally, most vaccines use weakened or inactivated versions of the virus to stimulate the body\u2019s immune response to create antibodies. In contrast, mRNA vaccines \u2014 such as Pfizer and Moderna\u2019s COVID-19 vaccines \u2014 take advantage of the natural process that cells use to make proteins in order to make a virus protein that triggers an immune response, building immunity against the virus.<\/p>\n
In other words, Moderna didn\u2019t need to have the actual virus to get to work. Edwards says within 48 hours of reviewing the sequence that was shared online, Moderna had designed its vaccine and started the process of making it.<\/p>\n
In those early weeks, he says the project felt more like one of their research activities. In March, the stakes elevated when the United States began implementing stay-at-home orders to flatten the curve, a global pandemic was declared, and Moderna and NIH started their phase 1 clinical trial.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe mindset shifted,\u201d Edwards says. \u201cIt turned into \u2018There\u2019s a global need. There\u2019s something that has to be done or else people are going to continue to die. Businesses are going to continue to be closed.\u2019 It became an all-consuming endeavor where there was no sacrifice too big or too small that we were willing to make personally in order to make this happen.\u201d<\/p>\n
[divider][\/divider]<\/p>\n
[blockquote source=”” cite=”” color=”” css_class=””]\u201c[W]ho would we be as scientists, as researchers, as global citizens to not give whatever had to be given in order to make [the vaccine] happen?\u201d[\/blockquote]<\/p>\n
[divider][\/divider]<\/p>\n
His team committed themselves to the mission and were prepared to do whatever was possible to make the vaccine as rapidly \u2014 but as comprehensive and as perfect \u2014 as they could because all three of those aspects were required to make the effort a success.<\/p>\n
When he says do whatever was possible, he\u2019s not understating the undertaking. There was a period of six months when Edwards worked 13 to 16 hours a day without a single day off. When he visited his parents in May this year, it was just his third day off since the vaccine project started.<\/p>\n
\u201cI think my head hasn\u2019t stopped spinning since then, but you can\u2019t say no if it means we could cut a day or a week or a month off our developmental process in order to get what was needed globally,\u201d Edwards says. \u201cThere were several times when we were all daunted. But we were not stopped. No matter how many moments where tears were shed, we pushed forward, and we made it happen. Because we knew we had the solution, and we knew that people needed that solution. So who would we be as scientists, as researchers, as global citizens to not give whatever had to be given in order to make it happen?\u201d<\/p>\n
On the days when the pressure was too much to handle, his 9-year-old son or 7-year-old daughter would pop into their dad\u2019s home office for an extra hug; his wife would offer a hand to hold.<\/p>\n
Prior to the start of the pandemic, Moderna employed less than 1,000 people. By comparison, the staffs of Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer ranged from 75,000 to 100,000 people. There were certainly challenges in being the small startup in this race.<\/p>\n
Moderna needed to scale up their manufacturing process to meet the future demand at a commercial level. They needed to bolster their clinical and regulatory affairs team because prior to the pandemic, Moderna hadn\u2019t needed a robust one.<\/p>\n
But in other ways, Edwards says, their small size was an asset. He can pick up the phone and call his CEO at any time. As a project team, they\u2019re able to debate and identify a course of action quickly.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe people that I work with are without exception incredibly brilliant, talented and motivated,\u201d Edwards says. \u201cHaving that unique motivation, talent and drive through an effort like this enabled a small team to do what should have taken a much, much larger team.\u201d<\/p>\n
Moderna\u2019s partnership with NIH was critical to make the process quick and comprehensive. The two formally entered a research collaboration agreement on pandemic preparedness in 2017 and had previously studied another coronavirus \u2014 Middle East Respiratory Syndrome \u2014 which gave them a solid foundation of knowledge for their COVID-19 response.<\/p>\n
The Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines were found in the real world to be 94% effective against COVID-19 hospitalization among fully vaccinated adults ages 65 and older in the United States, according to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study published in April. Another study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that among 417 employees at New York\u2019s Rockefeller University who were fully vaccinated with either the Pfizer or Moderna shots, only two of them (0.5%) tested positive for COVID-19 later.<\/p>\n
\u201cThey\u2019ve completely redefined the way we are going to do vaccines,\u201d says Stephen Lambert, professor of medicine at Âé¶¹Ó³»´«Ã½ who served as a mentor to Edwards. \u201cIf you look at when the polio vaccine was first made in the 1950s, improper inactivation of the live virus led to 40,000 children actually catching polio from the vaccine. With the mRNA technology, this is not even an issue. You could not have made a vaccine that fast using traditional methods. This technology has probably saved tens of thousands of lives. What they\u2019ve done is a huge leap forward.\u201d<\/p>\n
[photo id=”22217″ title=”LineDivider” alt=”” position=”left” width=”150px”][\/photo]<\/p>\n
For all of the distress COVID-19 caused, it also broke down barriers that helped lead to those scientific breakthroughs.<\/p>\n
\u201cEverybody was willing to work with everybody else \u2014 competing companies working with each other or government agencies and commercial companies working together,\u201d Edwards says. \u201cThat\u2019s the biggest lesson learned in this experience \u2014 that we can really do a lot more in everything if we can just keep those barriers at a minimum.\u201d<\/p>\n
Edwards says arriving at the finish line first with an approved vaccine would have been the cherry on top for the sacrifices he and his team made. But make no mistake, when Pfizer presented to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration a week before Moderna for approval of emergency use authorization, Edwards says he was absolutely rooting for his competitor.<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m sure they were rooting for us just as strongly,\u201d Edwards says. \u201cI worked directly with Dan Barouch, who led the team that designed the vaccine for Johnson & Johnson, and as soon as the committee was over I called him up and said, \u2018Congratulations, great work.\u2019 We legitimately were rooting for and continue to root for the other companies because no one company can make 7 billion doses of the vaccine.\u201d<\/p>\n
Right now, Moderna\u2019s main focus is still on the pandemic and responding to the virus\u2019 evolution. Edwards is helping develop potential booster shots that may cover the variants of the virus that popped up after the initial vaccine was greenlighted for distribution.<\/p>\n
Graham also stresses the importance of getting the vaccine distributed in developing nations.<\/p>\n
\u201cAs a relatively new technology and as something that didn\u2019t really have a supply chain developed for high-scale manufacturing, it\u2019s still relatively expensive compared to some other technologies,\u201d Graham says. \u201cI\u2019d like to figure out how to get the cost down or at least get the technology exported into the developing world, so we can get more of this made in more places.\u201d<\/p>\n
Last spring, in an effort to help address that very issue, Moderna announced it would not enforce vaccine patents during the pandemic.<\/p>\n
Although mRNA vaccine technology had been studied for decades before the pandemic, the COVID-19 vaccine was the first to make it through the FDA\u2019s approval stage for distribution. Last year has proven the technology\u2019s safety, viability and possibilities.<\/p>\n
Edwards says he looks to grow Moderna\u2019s infectious disease team and resources to enable the development of more vaccines against more targets and extending to therapeutics, cancers and other rare diseases. For instance, Moderna has already received positive interim data for a cytomegalovirus (CMV) vaccine candidate that is entering a phase 3 trial, and has a robust investigational clinical vaccine pipeline that includes a promising HIV vaccine, Edwards says.<\/p>\n
Despite succeeding in his goals in the most challenging year of his life, Edwards still approaches each day of his job with a hunger to continue to do and be better.<\/p>\n
And on the days when it\u2019s harder for him to believe he can make a difference, he looks at a small sign his wife gifted him that reads, \u201cDon\u2019t forget how awesome you are.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cI tend to get down on myself and don\u2019t give myself credit,\u201d Edwards says.<\/p>\n
He might not.<\/p>\n
But now the rest of the world can.<\/p>\n
[photo id=”21863″ title=”Mom-vaccine-web” alt=”elder woman getting vaccine” position=”center” width=”300px”][\/photo][photo id=”21862″ title=”Dad-vaccine-web” alt=”elder man getting vaccine” position=”center” width=”300px”][\/photo]<\/p>\n
[divider][\/divider] \n[blockquote source=”” cite=”” color=”” css_class=””]\u201cWhen I think about what I\u2019m going to remember most from this last year, it\u2019s that moment of satisfaction of knowing that my parents were going to be OK and knowing I helped protect people.\u201d[\/blockquote]<\/p>\n
[divider][\/divider]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":21765,"template":"","categories":[977],"tags":[287,1469,1544],"class_list":["post-21628","story","type-story","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-feature","tag-college-of-sciences","tag-coronavirus","tag-darin-edwards","issues-1541","issues-summer-2021"],"yoast_head":"\n
Modern(a) Man: How a Âé¶¹Ó³»´«Ã½ Alum Helped Create the COVID-19 Vaccine<\/title>\n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n\t \n\t \n\t \n \n \n \n \n\t \n