College of Medicine<\/a><\/em><\/p>\nResearch has suggested a number of concerns related to the presence of, and reliance on, advanced technologies in the medical environment \u2014 specifically, in the OR. As a surgeon, my clinical practice coincided with a great expansion of OR technologies. The miniaturization of image- processing devices allowed for the development of minimally invasive operating techniques that could be performed using altered standard instruments (e.g., scissors made small enough to fit in a tiny wound) or remarkably complex platforms like the surgical robot. These technological advances have led to a reconsideration of the risk-benefit analysis for every revised procedure \u2014 and the process has not been easy.<\/p>\n
[blockquote source=”” cite=”” color=””]”Given this new instrument\u2019s capabilities, what would you do if it misfired? How would you handle the complication of this instrument not turning off ?”[\/blockquote]<\/p>\n
The concern for me has not been the technology itself but, rather, in the training of the end user and the nuanced development of judgment related to the use of the technology. It has been customary practice for a surgical device manufacturer to develop a new tool, market it to the user, and train the user in some sort of workshop or seminar, thereby clearing the road for its use in patients. This type of training does not generally test for competence and typically does not assess the judgment of the user. Instead the sessions tend to focus on confirming that the clinician can utilize the instrument. Although that is an important outcome of the manufacturer-provided education, the more important discussion should center on questions such as: Given this new instrument\u2019s capabilities, what would you do if it misfired? How would you handle the complication of this instrument not turning off ? What if the instrument was stuck inside the patient? These types of questions are not frequently addressed when a new device or instrument is first presented to the medical community; the issues only become evident after there are complications once it is in use. Competence and judgment are much harder to assess than attendance at a weekend symposium.<\/p>\n
I agree that in the hands of a poorly trained surgeon HIT can lead to catastrophic consequences, much like a poorly trained pilot could place many individuals in simultaneous peril. The medical community has drawn many analogies to the airline safety movement in the past and, although many are appropriate, the surgical environment has its nuances. A number of well-meaning efforts to incorporate checklists and other airline industry standards in the OR have proven to simply be added bureaucracy. The overall improvement in patient outcomes has been difficult to ascertain and many checklist boards sit unfilled in our operating rooms. Team training has also received a lot of attention and, in many cases, is absolutely critical. We see the positive impact of team training in cases where complex and specialized equipment is used, for example, in procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass. In these cases, many individuals with specific training must work in a highly synchronized series of steps to carry out a procedure, and in cases of unanticipated complication they must be able to troubleshoot together.<\/p>\n
Technology is generally not the problem. Training metrics must be developed that assess the ability to apply clinical judgment to the use of a device along with competence in its use, and comparisons or models of training in other complex systems should inform OR\/HIT training. This training should not be left to the equipment manufacturer alone. The market drive in our medical system has led to a tremendous revolution in technology that has been useful, but it has at times been delivered to end users prematurely.<\/p>\n
Illustration (Above) by Tim McDonagh<\/small><\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":6731,"template":"","categories":[],"tags":[324,654],"class_list":["post-6611","story","type-story","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-college-of-business","tag-college-of-medicine","issues-520","issues-summer-2015"],"yoast_head":"\nHealth Information Technology: The Dark Side<\/title>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\n\n\n\t\n